Dmitry V. Fedorov, Baris Sumengen, B.S. Manjunath
Modern optic systems carry several fundamental limitations. One of them is the low depth-of-field. Usually, certain objects at particular distance are focused while other objects are blurred to a degree depending on their distances from the camera (see Fig. 1). This problem is encountered in photography and microscopy.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Img. 1a) first image of 9 | Img. 1b) last image | Img. 1c) Combined result | Img. 1d) Depth map |
Our framework for image processing using local information provides a solution. Our approach is robust to acquisition parameters and temporal changes. Since we blend the images using pixel data from the spatial domain (as opposed to fusing the information in a transform domain), the resulting images have fewer artifacts. The results presented for microscopy and hand held consumer cameras demonstrate good quality and computational efficiency.
This example shows the comparison of our result with the method from "Photomontage" paper by Aseem Agarwala. Images were retreived from the author's website
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Img. 2a) 1st of input images | Img. 2b) 4th of input images | Img. 2b) 8th of input images | Img. 2c) Our result | Img. 2e) Result by the "Photomontage" method |
Two images of hydrant with focus setting at 20cm (a) and 2m (b). Consumer camera positioned on the tripod, the images present small temporal changes due to wind. c) Combined resultant image.
![]() |
||
| Img. 2a) Focus at 20cm, flowers are focused | Img. 2b) Focus at 2m, hydrant is focused | Img. 2c) Combined result |
a-b) Two of the four slightly misaligned images of integrated optical waveguide acquired by Scanning Electron Micrograph (SEM). c) Our result. d) The result of wavelet image fusion.
Three images of fire with focus setting at 20cm (a), 2m (b) and infinity (c) from hand held consumer camera and combined resultant image (d).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Img. 2a) Focus at 20cm | Img. 2b) Focus at 2m | Img. 2c) Focus at infinity | Img. 2d) Combined result |
Three images of monument with focus setting at 20cm (a), 2m (b) and infinity (c) from hand held consumer camera and combined resultant image (d).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Img. 2a) Focus at 20cm | Img. 2b) Focus at 2m | Img. 2c) Focus at infinity | Img. 2d) Combined result |
Two images of plants with focus setting at 2m (a), and infinity (b) from hand held consumer camera and combined resultant image (c).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Img. 2a) Focus at 2m | Img. 2b) Focus at infinity | Img. 2d) Combined result |
High Resolution Through-Focus Movie of 40 frames (a,b) through the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus and the in-focus result (c) with cell counting result in yellow. *Video provided by Robert W. Williams from Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Tennessee.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Img. 2a) Frame 10 | Img. 2b) Frame 28 | Img. 2d) Combined result of 40 |
This project is supported by the NSF Information Technology Research grant #0331697.
Abstract preview: "We propose an algorithm to generate one multi-focus image from a set of images acquired at different focus settings. First images are registered to avoid misalignment if needed. Then, best focus is es..." [more]